Click here to receive your FREE subscription to Campus Technology
5/12/2004
In a recent articled titled The Impact of Technologies on Learning, researchers at the University of Washington reported on substantive focus groups with more than 100 students and faculty through a program called Listening to the Learner.
The results were what you might expect. Students clearly want to see faculty make more use of pertinent technologies, and faculty meet up with a number of barriers, such as lack of equipment, lack of rewards for the use of technology, and culture shock-as one faculty member put it, feeling like a Pony Express rider just as the telegraph comes along. The study recommends a reorganization of technology support, but those recommendations don't affect IT managers much. To tell you the truth, I think the study highlights, once again, academic departments' lack of understanding of what their own mission might be, and the concomitant lack of a departmental strategic plan.
The University of Washington study asked students about their desire for using technology in coursework, and faculty about current approaches/barriers. The results are grouped in several categories: Students Expectations of Technologies in Course Work; Additional Technologies Students Use; Students' Preferred Instructional Methods; Faculty Barriers to Integration of Technology; Integration of Educational Technologies; Development of Educational Technologies; Organization of Technology Support; and Faculty Training.
The authors conclude that their findings "illustrate a need for future research investigating this discrepancy, aiming not only to listen to what university and college communities expect of technologies but also to develop and implement successful recommendations for technology adoption." If I were being particularly cynical, that sounds like "Fund some more research," but it's also reminiscent of what I hear frequently from campus facilities infrastructure planners and designers.
Facilities planners and designers often bemoan the lack of understanding higher education institutions often have about what it is they want to do with their facilities-just like these authors seem to be asking what it is that institutions want to do with their technologies. And, if I failed to mention it earlier, these are not top-end technologies that the students, in particular, want to see more use of. We're talking overhead projectors, spreadsheets, and the like; stuff that can easily be seen as "infrastructure" without offending anyone.
Rather than overall conclusions, however, you may be most interested in what the authors recommend regarding reorganizing technology support. As might be expected, they recommend 'better education"-meaning two things: (a) finding ways to better inform faculty about what they have available and how to use it, and (b) better informing students and faculty about the pre-existing programs and resources that exist right now, but which many of them do not know about.
:::::: SECURITY SPOTLIGHT
: Smart Phone Security: New Challenges for Road Warriors:::::: CAMPUS SECURITY NEWS
: SMobile Releases Antivirus To Protect Google Android Phones:::::: CASE STUDY
:: Cornell Takes Visual Approach to Data Analysis
:::::: IT NEWS
:: Panopto Launches Hosted Lecture Capture System:::::: EXECUTIVE VIEW
: Delta iTunes U Enhances Learning in a Familiar Web 2.0 Environment
:::::: WORTH NOTING
: Caltech Completes Parking Structure Solar Array
: Schools Take Recruitment Virtual with Online Education Expo
: Blackboard Managed Hosting Rolls Out Virtual Operating Environment
: Higher Ed Help Desk Platform Adds Web 2.0 Tools
: Moodle Gets Student Verification Capabilities
:::::: TECHNOLOGY TRENDS
: Microblogging and Relevancy:::::: NEWS and PRODUCT UPDATES
: Open Source Java Libraries Debut for uPortal:::::: NEWS
: Caltech Completes Parking Structure Solar Array:::::: CASE STUDY
:: Small College Makes Big Leap in Wireless
:::::: IT NEWS
:: Washington U Healthcare Researchers Turn to Virtual Storage