Unintended Consequences of MIT's Open Course Initiative

Click here to receive your FREE subscription to Campus Technology

Home > Unintended Consequences of MIT's Open Course Initiative

Current News

Unintended Consequences of MIT's Open Course Initiative

12/10/2003

By Terry Calhoun

The leaders of MIT's Open Courseware Initiative (OCI) admit they're already hearing from people who are asking faculty and staff at other schools if they are using "the MIT curriculum." During a panel discussion at the Syllabus conference in Boston this week (Webcast: http://stellar.mit.edu/S/project/opensource/index.html), they made it clear that "adoption" of the MIT curriculum by other institutions is not part of its purpose, but that "adaption" of the MIT curriculum is a good thing.

It seems as though OCI is leading to a more far-reaching "peer review" of curricula than ever before possible. Sounds good to me! In at last one small way, it's reminiscent of G. Randolph Mayes' call here last August for a more "transparent" university.

I was supposed to be in Boston, this week, but I didn't get there. As the last weekend approached I viewed the weather reports with trepidation, and when the Syllabus editor, Mary Grush, called me to let me know there was a room available for me in the conference hotel for Saturday night, I regretted to inform her that my flight had been cancelled. Two additional cancelled flights later; it became clear to me that I was not getting to Boston at all. So I have missed a really good conference and some really great speakers.

But thanks to the wonders of our information technology, and some contributed infrastructure and time by MIT, the Campus Computing Project, and Apple Computer Inc., I was able to listen live to the session, in which the Campus Computing Project's Kenneth C. Green interviewed two sets of panelists, one on Open Source and one on OCI. The entire session is archived for streaming at the link above. I recommend the first half also, which gets into what non-techies need to know when choosing between off-the-shelf software or joining with collaborative open source projects. Please recommend it to high-level folks at your institution - they can listen to it in less than an hour.

But it was something in the discussion of OCI that really got my attention. Casey kept pushing on the "why" question: "Why is MIT willing to spend what some estimate at upwards of $100 million to share all of its course materials with the world?" His panelists were Ann H. Margulies, OCI executive director, and Steven R. Lerman, director of the Center for Educational Computing Initiatives - both at MIT. They characterized the efforts so far as Web-based publication of educational materials produced at MIT; kind of the raw materials which learners and educators can use to advance their own education or to teach others. And they know that other educators are so far mostly taking out bits and pieces - a segment or a simulation here and there.

Then it got really interesting. Steve noted that our faculty has always shared their syllabi with professional peers, way back when mimeograph technology first appeared, and then xerography. He suggested that in some way this was similar, but with the obvious enhancements of Internet availability, a shared structure, consistent cross-referencing, and meta-tagging.